This section discusses everything related to Christian music.

Interesting Bloopers in songs

Many songs, as I noticed, have some semantic inconsistency. The purpose of this topic is not to mock songs, authors or performers, but try to avoid mistakes themselves. As the famous proverb says: “They learn from mistakes,” but it is better to study on other people's mistakes. So, mistakes in the studio!

• Registration: APR 2006
• Posts: 141

Re: Interesting Bloopers in songs

Semantic inconsistency – more hollow! Many texts are generally written in an unfamiliar language. That is, it seems to be in Russian, but understandable only to the author. I will not poke my finger, but from the now Christian projects on the fingers of one hand, one can count those whose texts can be called poems. After all, the lyrics are still poems. Maybe white – but still there should be poetry. And here is simply ignorance of the language – not just literary, but colloquial.
I am generally tormented by the question – why in our time Christian is always worse than the quality of the worldly? Is it because Christians believe – We are talking about God, and this is already enough? But, probably, we must talk about the Creator of everything, striving for perfection. This applies to music, and poems, etc.
By the way, 90% of what we are calling for classics today (both music and literature) were created for God! Compare with today's works
I still poke my finger – I just go behind the disk to remember the song

Comment

• Registration: APR 2006
• Posts: 141

Re: Interesting Bloopers in songs

Here is a fragment of a song of a famous and promoted group. Let's call her D.. I like her, and when I listened for the first time, I paid attention more to music. Then I listened to the second time – and I don’t take this disk in my hands anymore.
This name is reliable, in this name is warm, in this name all troubles fly away far . In this name is the road, in this name the arrow, in this name, flew away forever and ever "
The idea, of course, is good, but the idea must also be expressed, the concept of rhyme is. This, of course, is not very funny – but, in my opinion, an example of how no need Write texts.

Comment

• Registration: Mar 2006
• Posts: 428

Re: Interesting Bloopers in songs

I agree with you: Christian songs are entirely saturated with standard phrases, unsuccessful rhymes (or non-and-dime), even often semantic inconsistencies. For example, how do you like such a rhyme:

There is already a semantic inconsistency. As they say, on the city Buzina, and in Kiwi uncle. At first it is said that people seek to catch the moment of happiness, and Jesus, in contrast to this moment of happiness, gives forever. Not happiness, no, to live sacred. Where is the logical thread?
Here is another song:

Comment

• Registration: Jun 2006
• Posts: 4

Re: Interesting Bloopers in songs

Yes, I agree that there must be a meaning in songs, but it seems to me that there is no need to be a rhyme at all. After all, when music lies, rhyme is no longer needed.
You also say that worldly music is always better. And I do not quite agree with this, there are many non -Christian songs, where there is no sense, no rhyme, no music, or voice. Take for example the group Hands up, or roots, where it is sung: Your emerald eyebrows are in the sign of the moon Emerald, it means green, pissing off like a Brezhnya, and most importantly not under the moon, but under the moon The sign of the moon. In general, just a set of words! It turned out not a girl, but some kind of kikimora!

Comment

• Registration: APR 2006
• Posts: 141

Re: Interesting Bloopers in songs

You also say that worldly music is always better. And I do not quite agree with this, there are many non -Christian songs, where there is no sense, no rhyme, no music, or voice.

ljudka, I did not say that worldly music always it is better. But, unfortunately, in the percentage of quality works in the children of this year is much larger than the children of the world. This is explained, in my opinion, simply – many Christians simply declare that they have such a call from God – “musical service” – and they are released on stage. To glorify the Lord is given to every believer, and God equally accepts praise from His child with absolute hearing and with a complete absence of hearing. But to lead in praise, to help the meeting to praise is really a call – and for him the Lord gives appropriate abilities.
And let such called will try to go through some worldly casting! There – commerce, mediocre will not be allowed on the threshold!

Comment

• Registration: Jun 2006
• Posts: 4

Re: Interesting Bloopers in songs

Well, yes, of course I agree with you. Christians often have such an opinion that if for God, then everything will have, in Prostota, although in fact it should be the other way around, for God the best.

Comment

• Registration: APR 2006
• Posts: 78

Re: Interesting Bloopers in songs

Yeah. And in some kind of song it was like this: I swim around the sea in Jerusalem.
Tell me, on which side of Jerusalem is there a sea? And how it is called.

Comment

• Registration: Aug 2006
• Posts: 1015

Oh, my favorite song. Ugh. subject.

What can I wash off?
She is stronger than the seas(gap of logic), O nothing only the blood of Jesus

Over church domes the sky is blue-blue…
And in the next piece:
…The sky is illuminated by the stars illuminated… (so blue or night?)

A quiet evening above the earth is pouring. (I wonder where?)
. years and centuries fly away, and we are sitting all the estimates. (Now people sometimes do not live up to 100 years, and here – they are sitting in the garden for several centuries)

Jesus the name is sweet to me
Jesus, praise you
Invariably, forever (appeal to Jesus)
Glorify all the mouth –
That is the name of Jesus. (appeal to all lips without any logical transition)

Well, and a very, very often encountered phrase:
. Alllujah to you. translated as glorify God to you

. Issus is now jam.
The Holy Spirit Obsessed, Sharp, we’ll be a wake!
Prospect: O for the whole you praise my soul. (By inertia, I wrote to you with a capital letter.)

Idesh to the miraculous sky
. Vid Evil to Christ Utikay!
Epispage:
VIN want, Shchob Tyg,
Shchob MITSNO, having tasted you Grih. (Of course, I understand that in the first piece it was about the devil, but, excuse me.)

Holy God, holy heaven,
The Lamb of God is holy, praise you. (Strange, and two words ago about God was spoken in the third person.)

. They executed Christ, rattling from under the sky!
He sits with his heart in the universe of the cave.
Spring day of the Savior Spring. (No comments)

You never forget Christ
. If the chest is ripe suddenly. (explosion, or what?)

The sages went out onto the road in the evening
Melted like candles, stars like a little. The stars are hiding in the morning, and in the evening they, on the contrary, are lit.

Let's zir ovy in the sky we will pass
. Pіdіymem his hands to heaven,
I Voice Sviv to God's Throne. It is very similar to the phrase: It was raining and two schoolchildren, one to school, the other in shoes

The name of the Lord Praise (collection of Christian above)
. With a stump of his name (to whom; to what), in his name (where), the name of the Lord Havl.

I want to talk to you
. My good, the best friend. (In the forest, spruce and trees grow)

Along VIA Doloroso (one of the translations)
. Torn the crown of thorny bone firm.

And this is not the limit. Many texts are correct, only in it they do not put the right pauses.

I see God.
. I believe in God There is no pause And in God's image pause I am transforming in spiritual life. The author wanted to convey a completely different one, it is much more logical to rearrange the pause in its place.

I spend, yak Savior
. I am hung up, shed sounds: Scho Mene Vid Muk to save pause Vin, having given the flour for me.
When listening, it seems that it is not Christ that shakes from the torment, but the sounds of our song, the second line is a separate thought. More correctly – to remove the pause and, preferably, put it in place of binary. Then: “I sing (about that) that he took for me torment to save me from the torment,” which is the thought that the author put into these lines.

And this is generally a unique number – only our sisters could sing this:
Saint! Saint! You are the holy Lord!
The text reads:
You are holy! Holy of you! You are the holy Lord!
(The song Everything that is in me).

And, in general, such errors are easily located if you try to correctly arrange signs of catching. What many, alas, do not.

Dear friends! I apologize to whom he has not yet answered. I now have a complete blockage on all fronts. A request, if you come to mind, pray for the device.

The singers, the main ones in the generations of the Levitsky, were free in the rooms of the temple,
Because day and night they Obligated We were engaged in their art. (1PA. 9:33)

Come visit: http://bmyr.kiev.ua/ (phonograms, notes)
http://formanta.bmyr.kiev.ua/ (Formant's vocal duet)